Now, I'm not sure what all of those 55% were thinking. I can imagine wanting to repeal the Affordable Care Act if I were fully persuaded that a better health-care law would immediately replace it - one that was funded either by a single payer or by not-for-profit private insurance; one that would put price controls on pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, hospitals, medical salaries, and other out-of-control expenses; one that would dramatically lower the cost of medical education so that we'd have more doctors, and so that more of them could afford to go into primary care; one that would assign a lot of primary care to pharmacists, midwives, physician assistants ...
Yes, I like socialized medicine. Not every aspect of it, and not necessarily the way it is practiced in every country that has it (though I'd be quite happy with France or Switzerland pretty much across the board). But even so, I don't think I would have answered yes to repealing the health-care law, because I don't think America has yet figured out how to do health care better.
Alas, most Americans are completely unaware that health care as practiced in other developed countries costs considerably less than our patchwork system, and that the results are nearly always equivalent or better. In fact, an October 2010 study by the Commonwealth Fund shows that "even as health care spending per capita has increased in the U.S. over the last three decades, the nation has fallen behind 12 other wealthy nations in 15-year survival for men and women at ages 45 and 65." Furthermore, the study points out, these rates can't be explained by smoking (we smoke less) or obesity (we're obese, but our obesity rate has increased less).
Steven Miles, MD, Professor of Medicine and Bioethics at the University of Minnesota Medical School in Minneapolis, has put together a fascinating Power Point presentation comparing health care in 15 developed nations. To see it, go to his faculty web page, scroll down (reading his impressive credentials as you go), and click on "US and Developed Countries: Comparing Health Care Systems - 2009." In 48 slides he not only compares systems, he also dispels myths and offers alternatives. Here are a few of his findings:
- Of the 15 countries surveyed, the U.S. spends the most per capita on health care.
- The U.S. has the highest infant mortality and the lowest female life expectancy at birth.
- The U.S. has the highest rates of preventable death.
- The U.S. has the lowest number of MDs per capita.
- Hospital stays are shortest in the U.S.
- Heart patients are likely to get more high-tech treatment in the U.S., but survival rates are the same as in countries that rely primarily on meds.
- Hip replacements are done more quickly in the U.S., but the fewest number of people get them.
- Americans should be healthier than others: we smoke and drink less than most, and we are on average younger than the others. We are more obese, however.
- The U.S. government - before the Affordable Care Act - was already spending more per capita on health care than were the governments of most of the other developed nations. U.S. individuals were spending way more.
- A major reason that Americans spend more, with poorer results, is that (unlike people in other countries) we do not make adequate use of primary care. A minority of us have a primary care provider that we see regularly. Too many of us neglect maintenance and go straight to specialists when the machine breaks down.
Probably someone who thinks that socialized medicine is diabolical, and that American health care is the best in the world.